Ripple Asks Court to Throw out SEC Case Following Commissioners’ Letter

  • July 28, 2021
  • Tim Alper
  • 57

The XRP-affiliated Ripple is looking to capitalize on a recent statement from members of the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) calling for more transparency in cryptoasset classification – and now hopes to have its protracted war with the regulator dismissed.

As reported last week, two of the five SEC commissioners, Hester Peirce and Elad Roisman, hit out at the regulator’s settlement with the Coinschedule website operator Blotics.

Peirce and Roisman issued a joint, open statement, writing that they were “disappointed” that the settlement “did not explain which digital assets touted by Coinschedule were securities.”

They added that this was “an omission which is symptomatic of our reluctance to provide additional guidance about how to determine whether a token is being sold as part of a securities offering or which tokens are securities.”

The SEC has charged Ripple’s CEO Brad Garlinghouse and Executive Chairman and Co-founder Christian Larsen with selling XRP as an unregistered security. But Ripple’s legal team has reacted quickly, sending a letter to the judge in charge of the case, Analisa Torres. In the letter, the Ripple legal team claimed that there was now clear evidence supporting the idea that the case be dismissed.

Pointing out that the commissioners had highlighted a “decided lack of clarity for market participants,” the legal team added that the letter undermined the SEC’s central allegation in the case – that Garlinghouse and Larsen had willingly and knowingly sold XRP, knowing that it was a security.

The SEC, the defense counsel noted, had claimed it would “show that [Garlinghouse and Larsen] knew or recklessly disregarded that Ripple’s offerings and sales of XRP required registration as securities and that those transactions were improper.”

On Twitter, the Hogan & Hogan lawyer Jeremy Hogan called the two commissioners’ letter “a gift for Ripple.”

Meanwhile, Ripple’s bid to quiz the SEC’s former Division of Corporation Finance head, William Hinman – the official who made the landmark 2018 speech stating that bitcoin (BTC) and ethereum (ETH) were not securities, and thus not subject to SEC control – has taken a new turn.

Ripple won its battle to question Hinman earlier this month, despite the SEC’s protestations. And in a letter to Judge Sarah Netburn, the Ripple lawyers wrote they had reached an “understanding” with the SEC on the Hinman matter, and had agreed to postpone his testimony. The legal team claimed it had made “substantial progress in narrowing and resolving privilege issues.”

They added that there had been “a compromise by all parties,” which would allow Ripple’s lawyers to “examine” Hinman “on various issues without triggering a privilege objection from the SEC.”

At 07:59 UTC, XRP, ranked 7th by market capitalization, trades at USD 0.547 and is up by 2% in a day, trimming its weekly losses to less than 12%. XRP is the worst performing cryptoasset among the top 30 coins today.

Source: Cryptonews


The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily reflect the view of News-crypto. News-crypto shall not be held liable under any circumstances for any losses, damages or expenses arising from the use of any content mentioned in this article.

The information contained on this website is provided for informational purposes only, with no warranties, or guarantees made as to the accuracy, completeness or timeliness of it. News-crypto assumes no liability or responsibility for any errors or omissions in the information contained on this site. We strongly encourage you to conduct your own research before taking any action.

This site may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. If you wish to use the copyrighted material from this site for the purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Authors or publishers who claim ownership of copyrighted articles reprinted on this website and wish for the content to be removed may email us directly at

If you would like to connect with us about any of the distributed content or other inquiries, please email us at with the relevant documentation.